Course 2024-2025

Essay I [LPHIB115]

  • 3 credits
  • quarter
Language of instruction: French / Français

Learning outcomes

This teaching unit aims to develop reasoning skills (relevance of arguments, logical organisation of the reflection) and expression skills (clarity of the text and precision of concepts), i.e. more generally to organise the content of an argued philosophical reflection. At the end of the course, the student should be able to: - problematise the subject of the essay, i.e. construct the philosophical problem implied by the proposed title on the basis of a precise and adequate conceptual analysis; - consider the different possible arguments and arrange them in a coherent plan; - construct an argument around an analysis of an example or philosophical references acquired in other courses; - to think critically by analysing the assumptions of the arguments being considered; - express ideas clearly using appropriate language.

Objectives

- To introduce the student to the questioning of prejudices through the development of a problematised and argued reflection; - To train the student in the construction of an argument, the definition of a concept and logical coherence; - Acquire a correct quality of written expression, i.e. clear and precise.

Content

After an introductory presentation of the recommendations and objectives of the exercise, the course consists of the completion of essay exercises by each student, followed by individual correction. During the preparatory work for the essay, students are invited to submit their questions and/or drafts to the teacher. In practice, this involves 5 exercises, and therefore 5 quotations, during the year. The themes and authors are extremely diverse. These quotations are followed by an essay written by the student.


Teaching methods

- Introductory courses; - Analysis and problematisation work on the proposed topics; - Writing of exercises with the possibility of individual follow-up and rewriting. More in detail: an introductory course (between 4 and 6 hours) is given at the beginning of the year to familiarise the student with the exercise. Then, for each essay, the student is required to : 1. draft a plan with specific constraints (theme, thesis, issues, keywords, relationships between keywords, plausible meanings of the quotation) which he/she discusses with the assistant, and which aims in particular to rid the student of his/her interpretative "prejudices" towards the quotation in question; 2. write a first draft of the essay, which again forms the basis for an exchange with the assistant; The correction of the essay is given to the students, first collectively, and then individually, depending on the student's progress.

Evaluations

Continuous assessment. Average of the work done during the academic year. This is a progressive work, which is therefore assessed on the basis of continuity. The final mark is weighted. It takes into account the student's development, both in terms of form (spelling, syntax, etc.) and content (philosophical argumentation)

Recommended readings

RUSS, J., La dissertation et le commentaire de texte philosophique, Paris, Armand Collin, 1998.

Language of instruction

French / Français

Location for course

NAMUR

Organizer

Faculté de philosophie et lettres
Rue de Bruxelles, 61
5000 NAMUR

Degree of Reference

Undergraduate Degree